Table of contents
My 5 D’s of ETTR
Do not trust exposure compensation alone.
If someone tells you that for ETTR he uses exposure compensation of not more than +1 EV, you should not blindly follow him. His reading may stem from matrix metering or spot metering; also he could have metered a blank frame or one with an actual photograph on it, either on a BW or color negative film. While “matrix metering +1 EV” may somehow work for ETTR, the same +1 EV for “spot metering” will most likely fall short. If you tell him to better use +3 EV, it is most likely too much for his matrix metering. When it comes to ETTR, “exposure compensation” and “meter method” belong together.
Do not trust exposure compensation + meter method, either.
Three out of four color negative films I examined can tolerate +3 EV (which includes some headroom); the fourth even +3.33. Bad if you have tested only that one thoroughfully and have become accustomed to +3.33 EV. So, what to do instead? In any case …
Do not consider exposure time alone.
If you see a DSLR-scanned film negative, and its description reads “digitized with 1/80 sec at ISO 100”: this exposure will possibly work for you. But only with same light source and comparable camera settings – and same film stock. That’s because …
Different films stock have different film base densities.
Some BW films have “gray” film base; others show a lighter gray. All color negative films are somehow orange, some of which are darker than others, and all being darker than BW negatives. So, for an optimal digitizing exposure, the same 1/80 sec for color films may be too much for BW negatives.
Do not rely on the red channel.
Overall, I found color negative films to have the highest luminance in the red channel (which thus clips first) and BW films in the green channel. Furthermore, with color negatives, the difference between red and green luminances is not much and varies between film stocks. I thus consider it advisable to be aware that under certain circumstances (such as imperfect film developing and characteristics of light source) also the green channel could have the highest luminances (which will then clip first) and to not rely on the red channel.
Histogram comparison of color and BW negative films
RAW data histograms for six different negative films. Data taken from a 900×600px rectangle in the center of a blank negative frame. Exposure as proposed by Nikon D5500's spot meter. Light source: Rollei Lumen Square at 100% power and 5500 K.
How ETTR helps DSLR-scanning film negatives
The common assumption of “increased number of tones” is a fairy tale. In reality, as exposure increases, the signal-to-noise ratio increases. The sensor data contains less noise. Hence, tones become cleaner (in terms of noise), and the digitizing result improves technically. When it comes to DSLR scanning, ETTR serves two advantages:
The blue channel gains most
With orange-masked color negative films, the luminances in the blue channel are nearly 2/3 EV behind its red and green counterparts. It thus contains the most noise. Blue luminances are responsible for bright yellow colors after conversion, so pushing them to the right will reduce noise. In the positive image, especially yellow or golden tones will come cleaner and more brilliant.
The photographed orange mask sets the tone
As a reminder: the photographed orange mask is the result of a certain distribution of red, green, and blue primary light in the individual color channels. As soon as in one of these the sensor gets saturated, the distribution of red, green, and blue gets shifted. The orange mask starts desaturating towards white. Any negative conversion that uses this shifted orange as a starting point will suffer color casts and dull shadows in the positive.
All this praising the advantages of ETTR is true up to a certain point where your camera sensor starts clipping the highlights. To stay within these camera limits, we have to answer this question:
Which channel starts clipping first?
To find this out, first digitize a blank frame of film stock with your preferred light source. Choose base ISO and your preferred aperture opening. Then expose in aperture priority mode as supposed by spot meter. Shoot an overexposure series. Each shot increments exposure by 1/3 EV — all the way up to your cameras’ exposure compensation limit. If you underway see “blinkies” on your camera display, you may ignore them.
Afterwards, open the files with a RAW analysis program like RawDigger. Examine the “normal” exposure and the first couple of overexposed RAW files. View their histogram to get an impression of the ‘shape’ the luminances form (in terms of distribution). See with each overexposure shot how the ‘shape’ wanders towards the right on the x-axis. Go on until you see the luminances start piling up to a straight vertical line – that’s the clipping. Go back one frame again and write down its exposure compensation value. If you like, subtract another half-stop “safety space” as headroom. Round to next third stop and calculate its concrete shutter time. This is your ETTR value, which is valid for that very film stock, camera, ISO, aperture number, and light source.